![]() ![]() He's more in the nature of the croc from lake placid or Godzilla. There isn't all that much scary in terms of suspense with him. As well his containment is usually just brutal battles, and story is mostly just tests in trying to kill him, however him constantly evolving. Even then I still have doubts that he wouldn't look like cgi trash. SCP 682 is another fan favorite who I don't feel can be done properly without a pro film team and high budget. I think SCP 3000 the giant eel which they get their amnesia drugs from is too grand of scale for a low-mid budget series to pull off without looking like dog shit. Some SCP that I feel are important may have to go unexplained or just alluded to. Have one of the Doctors doing an post-mission or pre-mission briefing/de-briefing which will info dump the meat of what you need to know, then it cuts into the containment team on the mission. Really you could set up most stories in a similar way that Tales from the Crypt was. But when SCP-049 escapes from Site-19, hell is unleashed. Secure, Contain, Protect - this has always been the goal of the SCP Foundation: to keep the Earths population ignorant and safe from the worlds anomalies. With Aaron McKee, Carson Strang, Graham Blackwood, Husam Younes. I think an anthology series would work well with the right team. SCP: Pestilence: Directed by Carson Strang. For the most part I'd say they'd just want to make sure that the rights for the iconic SCP are covered. It all depends on if they own a trademark or if they had surrendered any rights to whoever runs the SCP game due to the wiki nature of the lore being ever evolving by many hands. However when the film was being made they had to consult the original creator of the creepy pasta. In the case of SlenderMan, there have been many games and stories based off of the character. Whoever initially created each SCP may own that character and need paid or consulted for any high budget series or film. Also the camera man needs to stop with the damn low angle shots, I keep seeing the top of the set and their shitty black curtain.Īs for the concept it could be difficult or easy to get the rights. I have seen better found footage films done with much cheaper cameras in better quality. I don't know what they were using to record with, but their editor did something funky and distorted the quality. They also wouldn't be wearing fucking skull biker bandannas on their mouths, and should be speaking in more military jargon and stay in formation. The SCP containment team/9-tailed fox should sound far more authoritative and military. Cinematography was horrible, Acting was horrible, costume department didn't do their job. The movie hinges on the SCP Foundation, a non-governmental organization that discovers this cult this cult commune. SCP: Overlord, a low-budget, 35-minute short film released in mid-November, already has garnered more than 3 million views on YouTube. Also not use a single person from that staff in any of those trailers. Kansas City filmmaker Stephen Hancock would seem to have a key to that audience. ![]() If they wanted to go the route of a mini series, I'd say they should partner with Netflix or Crypt TV. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |